French startup Holimaker wants to make plastic manufacturing accessible by fabricating micro-industry tools for plastic processing. Their core product, the Holipress, is a manual injection moulding machine that enables engineers and product designers to process plastic on their desktop in low quantities for prototypes, pilot production, or even limited series of end-use parts.
The company offers feasibility studies to their customers, using 3D printed moulds for their fast turnaround and low costs. This allows their clients to quickly and affordably prototype designs and validate final manufacturing conditions during the pilot production phase of new product introduction. By using the same manufacturing method, including mould design and materials, these parts can be tested in the field and ensure the designs are ready to be produced at scale. The 3D-printed mould designs can then be easily adapted for tool-grade steel during mass production.
Holimaker uses 3D-printed injection molds in 80% to 90% of their current project. We met with Managing Director Aurélien Stoky and Marketing Director Vivien Salamone to understand how they combine both technologies.
Traditionally, injection moulds are fabricated via expensive industrial methods such as CNC machining or electrical discharge machining (EDM). For smaller part quantities though, the cost, time, specialized equipment, and skilled labour required to fabricate the mould out of common tooling metals and with these traditional manufacturing methods introduce barriers to the process, often making injection moulding at this scale unobtainable for many companies.
Leveraging 3D printing to fabricate injection moulds for prototyping and low-volume production significantly reduces these barriers compared to metal moulds, while still producing high-quality and repeatable parts.With 3D printed molds, Holimaker’s team can dramatically shorten the lead time for mold production and iterate new designs to optimize the geometry within a single day.
"We often design the mold in the morning, print it during the day and we can test the injection in the afternoon to modify the design and start a second print overnight. With a traditional method, we would need to machine the mold again which would take weeks," said Stoky.
Holimaker has looked into alternative ways for mould making. For orders over a thousand parts, they would employ a machined aluminium mould, but for smaller quantities, they run the press on 3D-printed moulds. In some cases, they combine both: for large volumes with demanding geometries, they machine the outside of the mould and 3D print the insert, which is replaced over time.
In-house 3D printing has also allowed them to venture beyond the limitations of machining techniques. In many projects, they achieved complex mould designs that would be difficult to manufacture traditionally, enabling their customers to innovate even more.
“In terms of geometry, some of our projects could not have been done without 3D printing," said Stoky.
Usually, the team iterates on three to four models per project in order to optimize the design. They follow the general moulding and design for manufacturing recommendations, such as including draft angles. They mostly work on small parts, and add 0.1 mm vents and 0.5 mm runners.
In addition, they respect a few printing rules such as including chamfers to help to remove the piece from the build platform, some centering pins to align both prints, and notches to assist opening with a screwdriver. They usually use 10 mm thick moulds and avoid thin cross-sections. Parts that are only 1-2 mm thick cannot endure the high temperatures.
Transitioning from a 3D printed mould for low-volume production to a machined metal mould for mass-production is seamless. Simple modifications to draft angles, gates, and air vent dimensions may be needed.
Holimaker’s team prints the moulds directly on the build platform at a 50-micron layer height. For small parts, this orientation saves printing time and resin by not using support structures; the team also observed better dimensional accuracy on the mould surfaces after curing. If dimensional errors occur, it is usually on the outside of the block that they post-process with hand sanding to fit the frames.
Holimaker prints with both Rigid 10K Resin and Grey Pro Resin. Grey Pro Resin is a more affordable resin suitable for moulding a few units of small parts at low pressure. However, moulds printed with Grey Pro Resin may deform as the number of cycles increases, therefore they favour Rigid 10K Resin for more technical projects.
The team uses the Holipress injection moulding machine in all their studies. It is a small manual press, easy to use, and available at a tenth of the cost of an industrial press.
The molds are placed into a prefabricated aluminum frame which holds the pressure better and ensures that the injection nozzle is not in direct contact with the printed mold.
With Formlabs printed moulds, Holimaker injects a broad range of thermoplastics with different levels of hardness from Shore 40A to 90A, at a three to five minutes cycle time. The number of cycles per mould varies from about 10 parts for a PA injected at 270°C to 100s of parts for a PP, TPE, or POM injected at lower temperatures. Holimaker is developing an integrated cooling system to help reduce the cooling time before demolding.
Stoky and Salamone had used another desktop printing technology before, but observed too much deformation on the prints even prior to injection.
“Formlabs parts offer great dimensional accuracy and surface finish. If there is a dimensional error, it is very minor, and it is uniform on the three axes, therefore we can predict it and post-process it. With other desktop printers, we could not control the deformation," said Stoky.
The team also appreciates the simple workflow that is easy to learn and operate, for example, automating the washing and curing process with Form Wash and Form Cure. They can go from design to moulded parts within a working day and then also iterate the design to optimize the model. "We often design the mould in the morning, print it during the day and we can test the injection in the afternoon to modify the CAD model and start a second print overnight," said Stoky.
Holimaker shared a few cases from their customers to give a better understanding of the part, molding conditions, and results of their feasibility studies.
Using in-house 3D printed moulds has resulted in considerable time and cost savings compared to outsourced machined metal moulds.
“We can shorten the time between the conception of the object and the injected part. We gain flexibility, and save time and money," said Stoky.